DRAFT: STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS &
INSTITUTIONAL PRIORITIES 2005-2010
![]()
Background
Academic Year 2003-2004
The new Shared Governance Model was developed
and
unanimously approved.
Academic Year 2004-2005
§
The Task Force on Integrated Planning & Budgeting
developed
the first Integrated Planning and Budget Model
for Merritt College Council
approved Model.
§
The College Council established the Integrated Planning
Committee, (hereinafter
referred to as the IPC) as a subcommittee of the College Council. The IPC
charge is to: conduct situational analysis; recommend 3-5 Strategic Directions;
recommend Annual Institutional Priorities; review, analyze & comment on
unit Annual Action Plans and Administrative Review, Analysis &
Recommendation (A.R.A.R.).
IPC composition: two Administrators appointed by the College
President, one from Instruction and one from Student Services; three Faculty
appointed by the Merritt College Academic Senate; two Classified appointed by
the Merritt College Classified Senate, one of whom must be the College Research
& Planning Officer; one student appointed by the ASMC.
The membership of the 2005-2006 Integrated
Planning Committee includes: Rashad Andrews, Linda Berry-Camara, Anita Black, Claire
Chapin, Ann Elliott, Horace Graham, Carmen Jordan-Cox, and Anika
Toussant-Jackson.
Summer 2005
§
The Integrated Planning Committee[1]
(IPC) held a two day Retreat (June 28 & June 29) to review the following
documents and identify critical issues and future directions related to
teaching and learning; access, success, growth and diversity; workforce and
economic development; facilities; technology; budget and budget process; and
community engagement: Accreditation Self-Study & WASC Responses, Program Reviews, Ed
Plan, College Facilities Plan, Matriculation Plan, Title III Documents, Annual
Program Plans from Categorical Programs. Four Strategic Directions were drafted.
§
The IPC held a half day retreat on July 15, where it refined
the draft institutional effectiveness statement; and drafted 2006-07
Institutional Priorities.
§
IPC endorsed the draft 2005-06 Institutional Priorities
needed in order to be prepared to implement 2006/07 Priorities.
Institutional effectiveness: draft definition
As an effective
institution committed to its mission, Merritt College galvanizes and organizes
its human, fiscal and physical resources to ensure that students attain
knowledge, master skills, and develop the appreciation, attitudes and values
needed to succeed and participate responsibly in a democratic society. In this
spirit,
Draft
strategic directions 2005-2010; Institutional Priorities 2005/06 & 2006/07
Strategic Direction
I: Student learning Outcomes
Improve the
effectiveness of teaching and learning at
Statement of Intent
As reflected in our mission statement,
a) identify expected outcomes as to what students should
know and/or be able to do as a consequence of completing a course program or
utilizing a support service;
b) systematically and routinely measure the attainment of
those outcomes;
c) effectively communicate the results of this assessment;
and
d) utilize the measurement /assessment data to revamp
/refine courses and support services and to inform allocation of human, fiscal
and physical resources.
2005-06 Institutional Priority
Develop agreed-upon institutional
Student Learning Outcomes.
2006-07 Institutional Priority
Each unit will identify expected outcomes as to what
students should know and/or be able to do as a consequence of completing a
course program or utilizing a support service AND develop related tools and
processes for assessment of same.
Strategic Direction II: Culture of Communication
To have clear
communication and listening be a way of life at
Statement of Intent
Consistent with Merritt’s mission to develop appreciation
and attitudes for success, provide lifelong learning opportunities, and foster
a caring learning environment, we will develop a community that excels in the
communication of ideas, values and decisions among all segments of the
a) create a shared understanding of how institutional
effectiveness is defined and measured;
b) provide regular and timely communication of ideas,
information, decisions, news, priorities, action plans and progress among
college constituencies; and
c) develop a feedback loop through which college
constituency can participate.
2005-06 Institutional Priorities
a) Implement the new Merritt Integrated Planning and
Budgeting System;
b) Create a shared
understanding of how institutional effectiveness is defined and measured; and
c) Develop agreed-upon systems for communicating ideas,
information, decisions, news, priorities, action plans and progress among
college constituencies in a timely manner.
2006-07 Institutional Priority
Each unit in the College will implement forums, systems and
opportunities for communicating ideas, information, decisions, news,
priorities, action plans and progress within
each unit and college-wide AND evaluate the effectiveness of the forums and
systems.
Strategic Direction III: Technology And Media Resources
Develop and
maintain technological, information and media resources that support the needs
of students, faculty, and staff and that are consistent with the College’s
mission.
Statement of Intent
An examination of the Colleges’ technological infrastructure
and media resources suggests that there are disparities in the technology and
media available to various segments within the College community. Some of these
disparities exist as result of resources managed by the PCCD; others are
specific to the
a) provide technology and media resources, appropriate
infrastructure modifications, and staff training sufficient to eliminate the
current disparities;
b) develop and implement College technology and media
standards; and
c) provide training so that information and learning
resources may be used effectively and efficiently.
2005-06 Institutional Priorities
a) Implement effective and efficient processes and
procedures for requesting and accessing Audio-Visual equipment and publish User
Guidelines;
b) Inventory Audio-Visual resources on campus, assess needs
and develop an A-V Plan for Merritt; and
c) Inventory Technology resources on campus, assess needs
and develop a Preliminary Technology Plan.
2006-07 Institutional Priority
Based on the 2005-06 inventory and assessment of technology
and media resources on campus and the preliminary plan (a) adopt and implement
a Comprehensive Technology Plan; and (b) implement the newly developed
Audio-Visual Plan.
Strategic Direction IV: Resource Development
Develop an
institutional approach to optimize the utilization of existing resources and
develop adequate future resources to support Merritt’s mission.
Statement of Intent
In order to enhance
institutional effectiveness, attain student learning outcomes, implement more
effective communication strategies, and provide appropriate technological and
media resources, it is imperative that the College maximize the utilization of
current human, fiscal and physical resources, invest in innovation and develop
new revenue streams. Specifically Merritt will:
a) pursue business partnerships that effectively link our
curriculum with industry needs as well as service learning opportunities for
students;
b) pursue grants, gifts, donations, and additional facility
rental;
c) provide faculty/staff training and mentoring as an
investment in our human resources; and
d) systematically maintain and upgrade campus facilities to
provide an excellent, clean, and safe environment for learning.
2005-06 Institutional Priority
Explore grants and partnerships that effectively link our
curriculum with community/industry needs, and develop a comprehensive list of
such opportunities.
2006-07 Institutional Priority
Based on the 2005-06 exploration opportunities, establish business
partnerships, create service learning initiatives, and purse grants, gifts, donations,
and additional facility rental.
POSSIBLE ACRONYM TO REFLECT MERRITT’S STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS

S Students First!
C Communication
O Outcomes
R Resources
E Evaluation
NEXT STEPS
Week of
Draft Strategic Directions and Institutional Priorities will
be sent to Academic Senate, Classified Senate, ASMC, and Administrative Leadership
Council for review and feedback.
August 8-19
Based on Draft Strategic Directions & Institutional
Priorities, each College Executive Administrator develops goals for his/her respective
Division (i.e. President’s Office, Instruction, Student Services and Business
& Administrative Services)
August 8-22
Academic Senate, Classified Senate and ASMC will review Strategic
Directions and Institutional Priorities with their respective Senates and
collect feedback.
August 11 (
Campus
August 16 (
Campus Summit/Professional Day to obtain campus feedback on
Strategic Directions and Institutional Priorities. (Target audience:
instructional faculty).
August 19
Division goals due from each Executive Administrator for
his/her respective Division (i.e. President’s Office, Instruction, Student
Services and Business & Administrative Services).Submit to College Research
and Planning Officer.
August 22
Senates submit their feedback to College Research and
Planning Officer.
August 31
College Council receives IPC recommendations and feedback
from three Senates, Administrative Leadership Council and two Campus Summits;
modifies (as needed), confirms and endorses Strategic Directions and Institutional
Priorities.